Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more

Recommended product

Popular links

Popular links


Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective

Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective

Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective

H. P. Lee, Monash University, Victoria
December 2011
This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.
Adobe eBook Reader
9781139119184
$191.00
USD
Adobe eBook Reader
USD
Hardback

    An independent and impartial judiciary is fundamental to the existence and operation of a liberal democracy. Focussing on Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States, this comparative 2011 study explores four major issues affecting the judicial institution. These issues relate to the appointment and discipline of judges; judges and freedom of speech; the performance of non-judicial functions by judges; and judicial bias and recusal, and each is set within the context of the importance of maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. The essays highlight important episodes or controversies affecting members of the judiciary to illustrate relevant principles.

    • Provides a lucid comparative study of the judicial institution in six liberal democracies that will appeal to those who are interested in the administration of justice
    • Focuses on four major themes of contemporary relevance, thus providing authoritative accounts of the important issues of contemporary significance affecting the judiciary in six liberal democracies
    • Gives valuable insights on how reforms can be made to the judicial institution while preserving judicial independence

    Product details

    December 2011
    Adobe eBook Reader
    9781139119184
    0 pages
    0kg
    2 b/w illus.
    This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.

    Table of Contents

    • Part I:
    • 1. Judicial independence and accountability: core values in liberal democracies Shimon Shetreet
    • Part II:
    • 2. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in Australia H. P. Lee
    • 3. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in Canada Martin Friedland
    • 4. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in New Zealand Philip Joseph
    • 5. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in South Africa Hugh Corder
    • 6. Appointment, discipline and removal of judges - fundamental reforms in the United Kingdom Kate Malleson
    • 7. Judicial selection, removal and discipline in the United States Mark Tushnet
    • Part III:
    • 8. Judges' freedom of speech: Australia John Williams
    • 9. Judges and free speech in Canada Kent Roach
    • 10. Judges and free speech in New Zealand The Hon. Grant Hammond
    • 11. The judiciary and freedom of speech in South Africa Iain Currie
    • 12. Judges and free speech in the United Kingdom Keith Ewing
    • 13. The criticism and speech of judges in the United States Charles Gardner Geyh
    • Part IV:
    • 14. Judges, bias and recusal in Australia Colin Campbell
    • 15. Judges, bias and recusal in Canada Lorne Soissin
    • 16. Judicial recusal in New Zealand Gerard McCoy
    • 17. Judges, bias and recusal in South Africa The Hon. Kate O'Regan and The Hon. Edwin Cameron
    • 18. Judges, bias and recusal in the United Kingdom Christopher Forsyth
    • 19. Bias, the appearance of bias, and judicial disqualification in the United States W. W. Hodes
    • Part V:
    • 20. Judges and non-judicial functions in Australia Patrick Emerton and H. P. Lee
    • 21. The impact of extra-judicial service on the Canadian judiciary: the need for reform Patrick Monahan and Byron Shaw
    • 22. Judges and the non-judicial function in New Zealand Sir Geoffrey Palmer
    • 23. Judges and non-judicial functions in South Africa Cora Hoexter
    • 24. Judges and non-judicial functions in the United Kingdom Abimbola Olowofoyeku
    • 25. Judges and non-judicial functions in the United States Jeffrey M. Shaman
    • Part VI:
    • 26. The judiciary - a comparative conspectus H. P. Lee.
      Contributors
    • Shimon Shetreet, H. P. Lee, Martin Friedland, Philip Joseph, Hugh Corder, Kate Malleson, Mark Tushnet, John Williams, Kent Roach, The Hon. Grant Hammond, Iain Currie, Keith Ewing, Charles Gardner Geyh, Colin Campbell, Lorne Soissin, Gerard McCoy, The Hon. Kate O'Regan, The Hon. Edwin Cameron, Christopher Forsyth, W. W. Hodes, Patrick Emerton, Patrick Monahan, Byron Shaw, Sir Geoffrey Palmer, Cora Hoexter, Abimbola Olowofoyeku, Jeffrey M. Shaman

    • Editor
    • H. P. Lee , Monash University, Victoria

      Hoong Phun ('H. P.') Lee holds the Sir John Latham Chair of Law at Monash University and was the Vice-Chairman of the Australian Press Council from 1994 to 2010. He was appointed an Adjunct Professor of Law, City University of Hong Kong in 2009. His areas of teaching and research interests include the judiciary, comparative constitutional law, administrative law and the Malaysian and Singaporean constitutional systems.