Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more

Recommended product

Popular links

Popular links


Demystifying Legal Reasoning

Demystifying Legal Reasoning

Demystifying Legal Reasoning

Larry Alexander, University of San Diego School of Law
Emily Sherwin, Cornell University Law School, New York
July 2008
This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.
Adobe eBook Reader
9780511406386
$39.00
USD
Adobe eBook Reader
USD
Paperback
USD
Hardback

    Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practice special forms of reasoning is false.

    • Challenges widespread assumptions about legal reasoning
    • The book offers a comprehensive analysis of methods of legal reasoning
    • Questions the current thinking about interpretation of legal texts

    Product details

    July 2008
    Adobe eBook Reader
    9780511406386
    0 pages
    0kg
    This ISBN is for an eBook version which is distributed on our behalf by a third party.

    Table of Contents

    • Part I. Law and its Function:
    • 1. Moral controversy
    • Part II. Common Law Reasoning: Deciding Cases When Prior Judicial Decisions Determine the Law:
    • 2. Ordinary reason applied to law: natural reasoning and deduction from rules
    • 3. The mystification of common-law reasoning
    • 4. Common law practice
    • Part III. Reasoning from Canonical Legal Text:
    • 5. Interpreting statutes and other posited rules
    • 6. Infelicities of the intended meaning of canonical texts and norms constraining interpretation
    • 7. Non-intentionalist interpretation
    • 8. Is constitutional interpretation different? Why it isn't and is
    • 9. All or nothing.
      Authors
    • Larry Alexander , University of San Diego School of Law

      Professor Alexander is a Warren Distinguished Professor of Law at University of San Diego School of Law. He is the author of: Is There a Right to Freedom of Expression? (Cambridge, 2005); (with Emily Sherwin) The Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001); Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge, 1998); (with Paul Horton) Whom Does the Constitution Command? (1988); several anthologies; and over 160 articles, book chapters, and review essays in jurisprudence, constitutional law, criminal law, and normative ethics. He has been a member of the faculty at the University of San Diego School of Law since 1970. He is co-editor of the journal Legal Theory (Cambridge), and he serves on the editorial boards of Ethics, Law and Philosophy and Criminal Law and Philosophy. He is co-executive director of the Institute for Law and Philosophy at the University of San Diego, and he is past president of AMINTAPHIL.

    • Emily Sherwin , Cornell University Law School, New York

      Professor Sherwin is Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School. She specializes in jurisprudence, property, and remedies. She is the author (with Larry Alexander) of The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001) and has published numerous book chapters, articles, and reviews in her subjects of specialty. She was a member of the faculty at the University of Kentucky College of Law from 1985 to 1990 and the University of San Diego School of Law from 1990 to 2003, when she moved to Cornell University. She is a member of the advisory committee for the ALI's Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment and a regular participant in roundtable conferences of the University of San Diego's Institute for Law and Philosophy.