Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence

Logical pluralism is the view that there is more than one correct logic. This is not necessarily a controversial claim but in its most exciting formulations, pluralism extends to logics that have typically been considered rival accounts of logical consequence – to logics, that is, which adopt seemingly contradictory views about basic logical laws or arguments. The logical pluralist challenges the philosophical orthodoxy that an argument is either deductively valid or invalid by claiming that there is more than one way for an argument to be valid. In this book, Erik Stei defends logical monism, provides a detailed analysis of different possible formulations of logical pluralism, and offers an original account of the plurality of correct logics that incorporates the benefits of both pluralist and monist approaches to logical consequence. His book will be valuable for a range of readers in the philosophy of logic.

• Proposes a monist account of logical consequence that accommodates the appeal of pluralism
• Provides a detailed analysis of different possible formulations of logical pluralism
• Offers an original account of the plurality of correct logics that incorporates the benefits of both pluralist and monist approaches to logical consequence