Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more

Recommended product

Popular links

Popular links


International Law Reports

International Law Reports

International Law Reports

Volume 159:
Elihu Lauterpacht, University of Cambridge
Christopher Greenwood, International Court of Justice
Karen Lee, University of Cambridge
October 2015
159
Hardback
9781107058927
£201.00
GBP
Hardback

    The International Law Reports is the only publication in the world wholly devoted to the regular and systematic reporting in English of decisions of international courts and arbitrators as well as judgments of national courts. Volume 159 reports on, amongst others, the 2014 Judgment (Just Satisfaction) of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Cyprus v. Turkey, the 2013 Order on Request for Provisional Measures of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in The Arctic Sunrise (Netherlands v. Russian Federation) and the 2014 English Court of Appeal decision in Belhaj v. Straw.

    • Contains the 2014 Judgment (Just Satisfaction) of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Cyprus v. Turkey
    • Contains the 2013 Order on Request for Provisional Measures of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in The Arctic Sunrise (Netherlands v. Russian Federation)
    • Contains the 2014 English Court of Appeal decision in Belhaj v. Straw

    Product details

    October 2015
    Hardback
    9781107058927
    812 pages
    225 × 150 × 50 mm
    1.18kg
    Available

    Table of Contents

    • 1. Cyprus v. Turkey (Just Satisfaction) (Application No 25781/94) (Grand Chamber) [EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS]
    • 2. The Arctic Sunrise (Kingdom of the Netherlands v. Russian Federation) (Request for Provisional Measures) [INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA]
    • 3. Bulgakov v. Ukraine(Communication No 1803/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]
    • 4. Cedeño v. Venezuela (Communication No 1940/2010) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]
    • 5. Naidenova and Others v. Bulgaria (Communication No 2073/2011) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]
    • 6. Fedotova v. Russian Federation (Communication No 1932/2010) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]
    • 7. Kholodova v. Russian Federation (Communication No 1548/2007) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]
    • 8. Singh v. France (Communication No 1852/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]
    • 9. Kovsh v. Belarus (Communication No 1787/2008) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]
    • 10. Achabal Puertas v. Spain (Communication No 1945/2010) [UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE]
    • 11. Estate of Kazemi v. Islamic Republic of Iran and Others (2014 SCC 62) (Supreme Court) [CANADA]
    • 12. R (JS (Sri Lanka)) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2009] EWCA Civ 364 and [2010] UKSC 15) (Court of Appeal and Supreme Court) [UNITED KINGDOM – ENGLAND]
    • 13. HJ (Iran) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • HT (Cameroon) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2010] UKSC 31) (Supreme Court) [UNITED KINGDOM – ENGLAND]
    • 14. R (ST (Eritrea)) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2010] EWCA Civ 643 and [2012] UKSC 12) (Court of Appeal and Supreme Court)) [UNITED KINGDOM – ENGLAND]
    • 15. SK (Zimbabwe) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] EWCA Civ 807) (Court of Appeal) [UNITED KINGDOM – ENGLAND]
    • 16. RT (Zimbabwe) and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • KM (Zimbabwe) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] UKSC 38) (Supreme Court) [UNITED KINGDOM – ENGLAND]
    • 17. Al-Sirri v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • DD (Afghanistan) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] UKSC 54) (Supreme Court) [UNITED KINGDOM – ENGLAND]
    • 18. Belhaj and Boudchar v. Straw and Others [2014] EWCA Civ 1394 (Court of Appeal) [UNITED KINGDOM – ENGLAND]
    • 19. Mohamad (Individually and for the Estate of Rahim, Deceased) and Others v. Palestinian Authority and Others(Supreme Court) [UNITED STATES OF AMERICA].